![]()
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING
LOCAL CRIME DATA
What are local crime data?
Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, which describes the JABG
Program, requires that states allocate funds to localities based on a formula consisting
(in part) of Part I violent crime data. Part I violent crimes are defined as: "murder
and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault as reported
to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for purposes of the Uniform Crime Reports."
For a detailed definition of the crimes as used in the UCR and Title I, as well as a directory
of state reporting agencies, please see the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program Methodology.
Where do local crime data come from?
Individual police agencies, including police and sheriffs' departments, and specialized
policing units, such as university and transit police, report crime counts to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, either through a
state UCR program or directly to the FBI. In the UCR program, these reporting agencies are
called ORIs. ORI originally meant "Originating Agency Identifier," but now the
acronym is synonymous with "reporting agency" in the UCR program, and "ORI
number" refers to the reporting agency's unique identification number.
Does the UCR cover all localities?
Not all police departments report Part I violent crimes. Many smaller counties and cities
have no serious crime or have no police department; some localities that do have violent
crime do not participate in the UCR program for various reasons. However, some 16,000
police agencies, covering 95% of the U.S. population, participate in the UCR program.
Does the UCR have any shortcomings other than nonreporting that might
affect my state?
Some states' statutes are not consistent with FBI definitions, or a state may be unable to
comply with UCR reporting procedures. If this is the case, the state's data are not
available through the UCR program. For example, the Florida state UCR program was not able
to comply with UCR reporting rules in 1996, and the FBI would not accept its data. In this
case, however, JRSA obtained the annual Part 1 violent crime counts for Florida localities
directly from the Florida state UCR program.
Occasionally a local agency will be late in reporting its crime data to the state UCR program. As a result, this agency's data may miss the deadline set by the FBI. In such cases, the data are not included in the annual data set when it is released.
Another situation affecting the availability of data from the UCR program arises with the implementation of the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) in recent years. Some states that have switched to the new NIBRS system were unable to report data under the old system and hence are not included in the UCR files.
Due to these shortcomings, the UCR data are analyzed for completeness by JRSA. In situations where the data set is not complete, supplemental data may be received from agencies, or state data may be received from the state UCR program. When these data are more complete than the FBI's UCR data, these data are used instead. For further discussion and to see a list of states for which supplemental data are used, see the Use of Supplemental Data.
How do I know whether some of these shortcomings apply to my state?
The state JABG administrators will be notified when this occurs, and it will be posted on the state page. States do, however, have the right to request that state or supplemental data not be included, just as they have the right to request the use of state data in other instances.
How do we match crime data to the justice expenditure data for local units
of government?
Fortunately, BJS and the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research
have developed the Law Enforcement Agency Identifiers Crosswalk. The crosswalk file
was designed to provide geographic and other identification information for each record
included in either the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) files
or BJS's Directory of Law Enforcement Agencies. The main variables for each record are the
UCR originating agency identifier number, agency name, mailing address, Census Bureau's
government identification number, UCR state and county codes, and Federal Information
Processing Standards state, county, and place codes. These variables make it possible for
researchers to match data based on either UCR identification information or Census Bureau
identification information. JRSA checks the database to ensure that any
localities that are not matched are checked by hand, and the crosswalk is updated annually. The original Crosswalk can be found at
the National Archive of Criminal
Justice Data, under study number 2876.
What else will JRSA provide?
We will provide a list of all agencies reporting UCR data in each state, showing
the three-year average number of violent crimes for that agency, along with the agency's expenditures. All data sets used by JRSA are also available upon request.
Which three years will be used to compute the average?
Generally, the FBI releases crime data roughly two years after collection. As a result, the three years typically used are four through two years out. For example, the FY 2008 calculations include 2004, 2005 and 2006 crime data. Each year an additional year of crime data are added to the formula. The exception is FY2000, when the crime data were released after the JAIBG
calculations had been released.
| Fiscal Year | Crime Data Years Used |
| FY2008 | 2004 - 2006 |
| FY2007 | 2003 - 2005 |
| FY2006 | 2002 - 2004 |
| FY2005 | 2001 - 2003 |
| FY2004 | 2000 - 2002 |
| FY2003 | 1999 - 2001 |
| FY2002 | 1998 - 2000 |
| FY2001 | 1997 - 1999 |
| FY 2000 | 1995 - 1997 |
| FY1999 | 1995 - 1997 |
| FY1998 | 1994 - 1996 |
Exceptions
Due to issues in reporting to the UCR program, some data sets may not provide enough
information for use in the formula. The following table lists the states for which
different years of data or for which state data were used in the formula.
| FY 1998 | FY 1999 | FY 2000 | FY 2001 | FY 2002 |
| Illinois (90-92) | Florida (94-95, 97) | Florida (94-95, 97) | Illinois (90-92) | Alabama (97-99) |
| Kansas (92-94 | Illinois (90-92) | Illinois (90-92) | Kansas (92-94) | Alaska (97-99) |
| Kentucky (93-95) | Kansas (92-94) | Kansas (92-94) | Kentucky (93-95) | Delaware (97-99) |
| Montana (93-95) | Kentucky (93-95) | Kentucky (93-95) | Maryland (96-98) | Kansas (92-94) |
| Montana (94-95, 97) | Montana (94-95, 97) | Montana (94-95, 97) | Kentucky (93-95) | |
| New Hampshire (94-96) | New Hampshire (94-96) | New Hampshire (94-96) | Maryland (97-98, 00) | |
| Vermont (94-96) | Vermont (94-96) | Vermont (95, 98-99) | Montana (95, 97, 00) | |
| West Virginia (96-98) | New Hampshire (94-96) | |||
| Wisconsin (96-97, 99) | Vermont (95, 98-99) | |||
| West Virginia (96-98) | ||||
| Wisconsin (97, 99-00) |
| FY 2003 | FY 2004 | FY 2005 | FY 2006 | FY 2007 |
| Alabama (98-99, 01) | Alabama (99, 01-02) | Alaska (00-02) | Alaska (01-02, 04) | Alabama (03-04, 05 State) |
| Illinois (99-01 State) | Illinois (00-02 State) | Illinois (01-03 State) | Delaware (01-02, 04) | Alaska (02, 04-05) |
| Kansas (92-94) | Kansas (00-01 State, 02) | Kansas (02, 01 and 03 State) | Illinois (02-04 State) | Delaware (02, 04-05) |
| Kentucky (93-95) | Kentucky (00-02 State) | Kentucky (01-03 State) | Kansas (02, 03 State, 04) | Illinois (03-05 State) |
| Maryland (98-99, 01) | Montana (00-02 State) | Montana (01-03 State) | Kentucky (02-03 State, 04) | Kansas (03 State, 04-05) |
| Montana (95, 97, 00) | New Hampshire (94-95, 02 State) | New Hampshire (01-03 State) | Montana (02-04) | Kentucky (03 State, 04-05) |
| New Hampshire (94-96) |   | Vermont (01-02, 03 State) | New Hampshire (02-04 State) | Montana (03-04 State, 05) |
| Vermont (02, 03 State, 04) | New Hampshire (03-04 State, 05) | |||
| West Virginia (02, 03 State, 04) | Vermont (03 State, 04-05) | |||
| West Virginia (03 State, 04-05) |
| FY 2008 |
| Alabama (04, 05-06 State) |
| Connecticut (04-05, 06 State) |
| Illinois (04-06 State) |
| Montana (04 State, 05-06) |
| New Hampshire (04 State, 05-06) |
Does my state have to use the FBI data in our JABG formula computations?
No. The legislation states that "if the State has reason to believe that the reported
rates of Part I violent crimes or law enforcement expenditure for a unit of local
government is insufficient or inaccurate, the State shall ...if necessary, use the best
available comparable data regarding the number of violent crimes or law enforcement
expenditures for the relevant years for the unit of local government." States with
state UCR programs may have more current, and perhaps more comprehensive, Part I violent
crime data. To see if such data are available for your state, contact your state's Statistical Analysis Center
or state UCR program administrator (see the UCR Methodology
for contact information).