Bibliography

Sorted by Date of Publication

Violence Against Women

2008

• Bachman, R., Zaykowski, H., Kallmyer, R., Poteyeva, M., and Lanier, C. (2008).  Violence against American Indian and Alaska Native women and the criminal justice response: What is known. NCJ 223691. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Taylor, B., Stein, N., Mack, A. R., Horwood, T. J., and Burden, F. (2008).  Experimental evaluation of gender violence/harassment prevention programs in middle schools. NCJ 221892. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.



• Wilson, D. B., Batye, K., and Riveros, R. (2008).  Testing and evaluation of the use of polygraphs to combat violence against women. NCJ 222115. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.




2007

• Kanuha, V. K. (2007).  Exploring the construction fo violence against women and children. NCJ 216951. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.




2006

• Bergen, R. K. (2006).  Marital rape: New research and directions. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Chamberlain, L. (2006).  Assessment for lifetime exposure to violence as a pathway to prevention. National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women.



• Postmus, J. L. and Severson, M. (2006).  Violence and victimization: Exploring women’s histories of survival. NCJ 214440. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Rosen, L. and Fontaine, J. (2006).  Compendium of research on violence against women, 1993-2005. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Teenage Research Unlimited. (2006).  .Teen relationship abuse survey.



• Teaster, P. B., Dugar, T. A., Mendiondo, M. S., Anbern, E. L., Cecil, K. A., and Otto, J. M. (2006).  Abuse of adults age 60+: The 2004 Survey of Adult Protective Services. National Center on Elder Abuse.




2005

• DeHart, D. D. (2005).  Pathways to prison: Impact of victimization in the lives of incarcerated women. NCJ 208383. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2005).  The world's women 2005: Progress in statistics. United Nations.



• Fortune, M. M. and Enger, C. G. (2005).  Violence against women and the role of religion. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Hammond, S. (2005).  Victim's rights state legislation in 2004. Criminal Justice Report, National Conference of State Legislators.



• Institute for Law and Justice. (2005).  National evaluation of the Legal Assistance for Victims Program. NCJ 208612. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Jasinski, J. L., Wesely, J. K., Mustaine, E., and Wright, J. D. (2005).  The experience of violence in the lives of homeless women. NCJ 211976. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• MacMillan, R. and Kruttschnitt, C. (2005).  Patterns of violence against women: Risk factors and consequences. NCJ 208346. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• O'Keefe, M. (2005).  Teen dating violence: A review of risk factors and prevention efforts. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Schwartz, M. D. (2005). The past and the future of violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20 (1): 7 - 11.




2004

• Amnesty International. (2004).  Making violence against women count: Facts and figures.



• Bell, H., Busch, N. B., Cook Heffron, L., White, B., Angelelli, M.J., and Rivaux, S. (2004). Balancing power through community building: Researchers, survivors, and practitioners set the research agenda on domestic violence and sexual assault. The Journal of Women in Social Work, 19, 404-417.



• Berkowitz, A. D. (2004).  Working with men to prevent violence against women: An overview (Part One). National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Berkowitz, A. D. (2004).  Working with men to prevent violence against women: Program modalities and formats (Part Two). National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Briere, J. and Jordan, C. E. (2004). Violence against women: Outcome complexity and implications for assessment and treatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (11), 1252 - 1276.



• Brush, L. D. and Higgins, L. (2004).  Research & evaluation on violence against women: Battering, work, & welfare. NCJ 205021. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Crenshaw, K. W. (2004). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Author.



• Dutton, M. A. (2004). Complexity of women's response to violence: Response to Briere and Jordan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (11): 1277 - 1282.



• Fisher, E. (Ed). (2004).  Violence against women and family violence: Developments in research, practice, and policy. NCJ 199701-199732. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Goodwin, S. N., Chandler, D., and Meisel, J. (2004).  Violence against women: The role of welfare reform. NCJ 205792. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Jordan, C. E. (2004). Toward a National Research Agenda on Violence Against Women: Continuing the Dialogue on Research and Practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (11): 1205 - 1208.



• Kilpatrick, D. G. (2004). What is Violence Against Women: Defining and Measuring the Problem. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (11): 1209 - 1234.



• Mechanic, M. B. (2004). Beyond PTSD: Mental health consequences of violence against women: A Response to Briere and Jordan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (11): 1283 - 1289.



• National Institute of Justice. (2004).  Violence against women: Identifying risk factors. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice. NCJ 197109.



• Resick, P. A. (2004). A suggested research agenda on treatment-outcome research for female victims of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (11): 1290 - 1295.



• Saltzman, L. E. (2004). Issues related to defining and measuring violence against women: Response to Kilpatrick. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (11): 1235 - 1243.



• Tjaden, P. (2004). What is violence against women? Defining and measuring the problem: A response to Dean Kilpatrick. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (11): 1244 - 1251.



• Walby, S. and Allen, J. (2004).  Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey. Home Office Research Study 276.



• Williams, L. M. (2004). Researcher-advocate collaborations to end violence against women: Toward liberating methodologies for action research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (11): 1350 - 1357.



• Yodanis, C. L. (2004). Gender Inequality, Violence Against Women, and Fear: A Cross-National Test of the Feminist Theory of Violence Against Women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (6): 655 - 675.




2003

• Anderson, M. J. (2003).  Marital immunity, intimate relationships, and improper inferences: A new law on sexual offenses by intimates. Hastings Law Journal, 54.



• Cascardi, M. and Avery-Leaf, S. (2003).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for practitioners. NCJ 201342. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DuPree, C., McEwen, T., Spence, D., and Wolff, R. (2003).  Evaluation of grants to combat violence against women on campus. NCJ 201306. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Echeburua, E., Fernandez-Montalvo, J., and Amor, P. J. (2003). Psychopathological Profile of Men Convicted of Gender Violence: A Study in the Prisons of Spain. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (7): 798 - 812.



• Jordan, C. E., Logan, T., Walker, R., and Nigoff, A. (2003) Stalking: An Examination of the Criminal Justice Response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18: 148-165.



• Moracco, K. E., Runyan, C. W., and Dull, L. (2003).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for public health policymakers. NCJ 201567. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Richie, B. E. (2003).  Understanding the links between violence against women and women's participation in illegal activity. NCJ 199370. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Williams, L. M. (2003). Understanding child abuse and violence against women: A life course perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (4): 441 - 451.



• Wolfe, D. A. and Jaffe, P. G. (2003).  Prevention of domestic violence and sexual assault. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.




2002

• Beeman, S. K. (2002).  Evaluating violence against women research reports. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Dudek, J. A. (2002).  When silenced voices speak: An exploratory study of prostitute homicide. NCJ 198117. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Ford, D. A. Bachman, R., Friend, M., and Meloy, M. (2002).  Controlling violence against women: A research perspective on the 1994 VAWA’s Criminal Justice Impacts. NCJ 197137. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.<



• Gilfus, M. E. (2002).  Women's experiences of abuse as a risk factor for incarceration. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• O'Donnell, C. J., Smith, A., and Madison, J. R. (2002). Using Demographic Risk Factors to Explain Variations in the Incidence of Violence Against Women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17: 1239-1262.



• Parker, G. and Lee, C. (2002). Predictors of Physical and Emotional Health in a Sample of Abused Australian Women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17: 987-1001.



• Tang, C. S., Cheung, F. M., Chen, R. and Sun, X. (2002). Definition of violence against women: A comparative study in Chinese societies of Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the People's Republic of China. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17: 671-688.



• World Health Organization. (2002).  World report on violence and health./LI>
  
  

  2001

• Jasinski, J. L. (2001). Pregnancy and Violence Against Women: An Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16: 712-733.



• Jasinski, J. L. (2001).  Violence against women: An examination of developmental antecedents among Black, Caucasian, and Hispanic women. NCJ 189243. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Tjaden, P. and Thoennes, N. (2001). Coworker violence and gender: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20 (2): 85 - 89.



• Uekert, B. K., Miller, N., DuPree, C., Spence, D., and Archer, C. (2001).  The Evaluation of the STOP Violence Against Women Grant Program: Law Enforcement and Prosecution Components. Institute for Law and Justice.



• *Walby, S. and Myhill, A. (2001). New survey methodologies in researching violence against women. British Journal of Criminology, 41 (3): 502 - 522.



• Wenzel, S. L., Leake, B. D., and Gelberg, L. (2001). Risk factors for major violence among homeless women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16: 739-752.



• White, J. W. and Smith, P. H. (2001).  Developmental antecedents of violence against women: A longitudinal perspective. NCJ 187775. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Widom, C. S. and Maxfield, M. G. (2001).  An update on the cycle of violence. National Institute of Justice Research in Brief.




2000

• Bachman, R. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for criminal justice policymakers. NCJ 199579. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Campbell, J. C. and Boyd, D. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for health care professionals. NCJ 199761. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Campbell, J. C. (2000). Promise and perils of surveillance in addressing violence against women. Violence Against Women, 6 (7): 705 - 727.



• Carlson, B. E. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for service providers. NCJ 199578. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Carlson, B. E., Worden, A. P., van Ryn, M., and Bachman, R. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for practitioners. NCJ 199577. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Ford, D. A. and Breall, S. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for prosecutors. NCJ 199660. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.<



• *Gordan, M. (2000). Definitional issues in violence against women: Surveillance and research from a violence research perspective. Violence Against Women, 6 (7): 747 - 783.



• Hagen, J. L. and Postmus, J. L. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for advocacy organizations. NCJ 199760. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Hastings, B. M. (2000). Social information processing and the verbal and physical abuse of women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15: 650-664.



• Hirschel, J. D. and Dawson, D. J. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for law enforcement officials. NCJ 198372. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Lambert, L. C. and Firestone, J. M. (2000). Economic Context and Multiple Abuse Techniques. Violence Against Women, 6 (1): 49 - 67.



• National Institute of Justice. (2000).  Measuring violence against women: Recommendations from an interagency workshop. NIJ Journal, October. NCJ 184447.



• Saltzman, L. E. (2000). Building data systems for monitoring and responding to violence against women, part II. Violence Against Women, 6 (8): 811 - 911.



• Saunders, D. G. and Hamill, R. M. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research on offender interventions. NCJ 201222. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Schwartz, M. D. and DeKeseredy, W. S. (2000). Aggregation bias and woman abuse: Variations by male peer support, region, language, and school type. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15: 555-565.



• *Smith, B. E., Davis, R. C., and Nickles, L. B. (2000).  Impact evaluation of victim services programs: STOP grants funded by the Violence Against Women Act. NCJ 183460, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Tjaden, P. and Thoennes, N. (2000).  Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. NCJ 183781. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.



• Worden, A. P. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for judges. NCJ 199911. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Worden, A. P. (2000).  Violence against women: Synthesis of research for task forces and coalition members. NCJ 199912. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.




1990s

• Campbell, R., Raja, S. and Grining, P. L. (1999). Training mental health professionals on violence against women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14: 1003-1013.



• Edleson, J. L. (1999).  The overlap between child maltreatment and woman abuse. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. (1999).  Ending violence against women.




---



• Bachman, R. (1998).  Incident rates of violence against women: A comparison of the redesigned National Crime Victimization Survey and the 1985 National Family Violence Survey. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Nosek, M. A. and Howland, C. A. (1998).  Abuse and women with disabilities. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Panos. (1998).  The intimate enemy: Gender violence and reproductive health.



• *Tjaden, P. and Thoennes, N. (1998).  Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Research in Brief. NCJ 172837, Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Tjaden, P., Boyle, J., Leadbetter, S., and Bardwell, R. A. (1998). Methodology report for the National Violence Against Women Survey. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



• World Health Organization. (1998). Violence against women: A priority health issue.




---



• *Coker, A. L. and Stasny, E. A. (1995). Adjusting the national crime victimization survey's estimates of rape and domestic violence for 'gag' factors. NCJ 173061. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal Terrorism and Common Couple Violence: Two Forms of Violence Against Women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57 (2): 283.




---



• Smith, M. D. and Kuchta, E. S. (1993). Trends in violent crime against women, 1973-1989. Social Science Quarterly, 74 (1): 28 - 45.




---



• Syers, M. and Edelson, J. L. (1992). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justice intervention in woman abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7 (4): 490 - 502.




---



• Harlow, C. W. (1991). Female victims of violent crime. NCJ 126826. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.



• *Koss, M. P., Koss, P. G., and Woodruff, W. J. (1991). Deleterious Effects of Criminal Victimization on Women's Health and Medical Utilization. Archives of Internal Medicine, 151 (2): 342 - 347.



• *Koss, M. P., Woodruff, W. J. and Koss, P. G. (1991). Criminal Victimization Among Primary Care Medical Patients: Prevalence, Incidence, and Physician Usage. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9 (1): 85 - 96.




---



• *Koss, M. P., Koss, P. G., and Woodruff, W. J. (1990). Relation of Criminal Victimization to Health Perceptions Among Women Medical Patients. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 58 (2): 147 - 152.




1970s

• Riger, S., Gordon, M. T., and Le Bailly, R.(1978). Women's fear of crime: From blaming to restricting the victim. Victimology, 3 (3-4): 274 - 284.