Bibliography

Legal System: Courts and Prosecution

Domestic Violence Publications

• Adler, R. and Owen, J. (2011). Relief from abuse orders in Vermont: Case processing 2004-2008. Vermont Center for Justice Research.
• Adler, R., Owen, J., and Wicklund, P. (2011). Domestic case processing in Vermont: 2004-2008. Vermont Center for Justice Research.
• *American Prosecutors Research Institute. (1996). Prosecution of domestic violence offenses, final report. NCJ 168057. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Berliner, L. (2003). Introduction: Making domestic violence victims testify. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (6), 666 - 668.



• *Brewster, M. P. (2001). Legal help-seeking experiences of former intimate-stalking victims.   Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12 (2), 91 - 112.



• Buzawa, E., Hotaling, G. T., Klein, A., and Byrne, J. (2000).  Response to domestic violence in a pro-active court setting. NCJ 181427. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Child Well-Being and Domestic Violence Project. (2005). Magistrate protocol for domestic violence cases: Guidelines with emphasis on issues related to children.



• Davis, R. C., Smith, B. E., and Nicklas, L. B. (1998). The deterrent effect of prosecuting domestic violence misdemeanors. Crime and Delinquency, 44 (3), 434-442.



• Elliott, D. S. (1989). Criminal justice procedures in family violence crimes. In Oblin and Tonry's (Eds) Family Violence. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 427 - 480. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.



• Finn, M. A. (2004).  Effects of victims' experiences with prosecutors on victim empowerment and re-occurrence of intimate partner violence. NCJ 202983. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Flemming, B. (2003). Equal protection for victims of domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (6), 685 - 692.



• Ford, D. A. (2003). Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (6), 669 - 684.



• Garner, J. H. and Maxwell, C. D. (2008).  Crime control effects of prosecuting intimate partner violence in Hamilton County, Ohio: Reproducing and extending the analyses of Wooldredge and Thistlethwaite. NCJ 222907. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Gover, A. R., MacDonald, J. M., Alpert, G. P., and Geary, I. A. (2004).  Lexington County domestic violence court: A partnership and evaluation. NCJ 204023. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Hartley, C. C. and Frohmann, L. (2003).  Cook County Target Abuser Call (TAC): An evaluation of a specialized domestic violence court. NCJ 202944. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Henning, K. and Klesges, L. M. (2003). Prevalence and characteristics of psychological abuse reported by court-involved battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (8), 857 - 871.



• Hirschel, J. D. and Hutchison, I. W. (2001). The relative effects of offense, offender, and victim variables on the decision to prosecute domestic violence cases. Violence Against Women, 7 (1), 46 - 59.



• Hotaling, G. T. and Buzawa, E. S. (2003).  Forgoing criminal justice assistance: The non-reporting of new incidents of abuse in a court sample of domestic violence victims. NCJ 195667. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Hotaling, G. T. and Buzawa, E. S. (2003).  Victim satisfaction with criminal justice case processing in a model court setting. NCJ 195668. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Jaffe, P. G. and Crooks, C. V. (2005).  Understanding women's experiences parenting in the context of domestic violence: Implications for community and court-related service providers. Violence Against Women Online Resources.



• Jordan, C. E. (2004). Intimate partner violence and the justice system: An examination of the interface. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (12), 1412 - 1434.



• Keilitz, S. (2001).  Specialization of domestic violence case management in the courts: A national survey. NCJ 186192. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Kim, J. and Starsoneck, L. (2007). North Carolina district courts' response to domestic violence: Best practices and judicial training.



• Klein, A. R. (2008).  Practical implications of current domestic violence research part II: Prosecution. NCJ 222321. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Klein, A. R. (2008).  Practical implications of current domestic violence research part III: Judges. NCJ 222321. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Klein, A. R., Tobin, T., Salomon, A., and Dubois, J. (2008).  A statewide profile of abuse of older women and the criminal justice response. NCJ 222459. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Klein, A. R., Wilson, D., Crowe, A. H., and DeMichele, M. (2008).  Evaluation of the Rhode Island Probation Specialized Domestic Violence Supervision Unit. NCJ 222912. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Miller, N. (2004).  Domestic violence: A review of state legislation defining police and prosecution duties and powers. Institute for Law and Justice.



• Mills, L. G. (1998). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence: A critical literature review and the case for more research to test victim empowerment approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25 (3), 306 - 318.



• National Institute of Justice and National Institute of Mental Health. (1996).  The validity and use of evidence concerning battering and its effects in criminal trials: Report responding to Section 40507 of the Violence Against Women Act. NCJ 160972. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.



• O'Sullivan, C. S., King, L. A., Levin-Russell, K., and Horowitz, E. (2006).  Supervised and unsupervised parental access in domestic violence cases: Court orders and consequences. NCJ 213712. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Paternoster, R., Brame, R., and Bachman, R. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law and Society Review, 31 (1), 163 - 204.



• Peacock, T., George, L., Wilson, A., Bergstrom, A., and Pence, E. (2003).  Community-based analysis of the U.S. legal system's intervention in domestic abuse cases involving indigenous women. NCJ 199358. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Pearson, J. (1997). Mediating when domestic violence is a factor: Policies and practices in court-based divorce mediation programs. Mediation Quarterly, 14 (4), 319 - 335.



• Public Safety and Advisory Board. (20011). The effectiveness of domestic abuse protective orders and court practices in sentencing violators.
• *Rebovich, D. J. (1996). Prosecution response to domestic violence: Results of a survey of large jurisdictions. In Buzawa and Buzawa's (Eds) Do Arrests and Restraining Orders Work?, 176 - 191. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.



• Rivera, M. (2010). Assaults in domestic violence incidents: Descriptive statistics and predictors of legal resolutions. Presented to the Abused Women's Aid in Crisis (AWAIC), Anchorage, AK.



• Saccuzzo, D. P., Johnson, N. E., and Koen, W. J. (2003).  Mandatory custody mediation: Empirical evidence of increased risk for domestic violence victims and their children. NCJ 195422. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Schlueter, M., Wicklund, P., Adler, R., Owen, J., and Halvorsen, T. (2011). Bennington County Integrated Domestic Violence Docket Project: Outcome evaluation. Vermont Center for Justice Research.
• *Sherman, L. W. and Smith, D. A. (1992). Crime, punishment and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57, 680 - 690.



• Shetty, S. and Kaguyutan, J. (2002).  Immigrant victims of domestic violence: Cultural challenges and available legal protections. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Smith, E., Durose, M. R. and Langan, P. A. (2008).  State court processing of domestic violence cases. NCJ 214993. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.



• *Syers, M. and Elseson, J. L. (1992). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justice intervention in woman abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7 (4), 490 - 502.



• *Thistlethwaite, A. (1999). Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: Conditioned effects of legal controls by individual and aggregate levels of stake in conformity. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati.



• *Thistlethwaite, A., Wooldredge, J. D., Gibbs, D. (1998). Severity of dispositions and the likelihood of domestic violence recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 44 (3), 388 - 398.



• *Thoennes, N., Salem, P., and Pearson, J. (2004). Mediation and domestic violence: Current policies and practices. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 33, 6 - 29.



• Tischler, C. L., Bartholomae, S., Katz, B. L., and Landry-Meyer, L. (2004). Is domestic violence relevant?: An exploratory analysis of couples referred for mediation in family court. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (9), 1042 - 1062.



• Uekert, B. K., Miller, N., DuPree, C., Spence, D., and Archer, C. (2001).  The Evaluation of the STOP Violence Against Women Grant Program: Law Enforcement and Prosecution Components. Institute for Law and Justice.



• Uekert, B., Peters, T., Romberger, W., Abraham, M., and Keilitz, S. (2006).  Serving Limited English Proficient (LEP) battered women: A national survey of the courts' capacity to provide protection orders. NCJ 216072. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B., Sagatun-Edwards, I., Crowe, A., Peters, T., Cheesman, F., and Kameda, D. (2006).  Juvenile domestic and family violence: The effects of court-based intervention programs on recidivism. NCJ 216614. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Wells, W., and DeLeon-Granados, W. (2002).  Analysis of unexamined issues in the intimate partner homicide decline: Race, quality of victim services, offender accountability, and system accountability. NCJ 196666. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Wilson, D. and Klein, A. (2006).  A longitudinal study of a cohort of batterers arraigned in a Massachusetts district court 1995 to 2004. NCJ 215346. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Wolf, R. V., Aldrich, L., and Moore, S. (2004).  Planning a domestic violence court: The New York State experience. Center for Court Innovation.



• *Wooldredge, J. D., Thistlethwaite, A. (1999).  Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: Individual and contextual effects of court dispositions and stake in conformity. NCJ 193268. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Wooldredge, J. D., Thistlethwaite, A. (2004). Bilevel disparities in court dispositions for intimate assault. Criminology, 42 (2), 417 - 456.







Sexual Violence Publications

• Anderson, M. J. (2004).  The legacy of the prompt complaint requirement, corroboration requirement, and cautionary instructions on campus sexual assault. Boston University Law Review, 84 (945).



• Campbell, R., Bybee, D., Ford, J. K., and Patterson, D. (2009).  Systems change analysis of SANE programs: Identifying the mediating mechanisms of criminal justice system impact. NCJ 226497. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Campbell, R., Patterson, D., Bybee, D., and Dworkin, E. R. (2009). Predicting sexual assault prosecution outcomes: The role of medical forensic evidence collected by sexual assault nurse-examiners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36 (7): 712-727.



• Greeson, M. R., Campbell, R., and Kobes, S. K. E. (2008).  Step-by-step practitioner toolkit for evaluating the work of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) programs in the criminal justice system. NCJ 226499. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Kelly, L., Lovett, J., and Regan, L. (2005).  A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. NCJ 211351. Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University.



• Koss, M. P., Bachar, K. J., Hopkins, C. Q., and Carlson, C. (2004). Expanding a community's justice response to sex crimes through advocacy, prosecutorial, and public health collaboration: Introducing the RESTORE Program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (12): 1435 - 1463.



• Nugent-Borakove, M. E., Fanflik, P., Troutman, D., Johnson, N., Burgess, A., O'Conner, A. L. (2006).  Testing the efficacy of SANE/SART programs: Do they make a difference in sexual assault arrest and prosecution outcomes? NCJ 214252. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Patterson, D. (2011). The linkage between secondary victimization by law enforcement and rape case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26 (2): 328-347.







Stalking Publications

• *Brewster, M. P. (2001). Legal help-seeking experiences of former intimate-stalking victims.   Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12 (2), 91 - 112.



• Miller, N. (1999).  Report on a 1998 national survey of law enforcement and prosecution initiatives against stalking.   Institute for Law and Justice.



• Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N., and Allison, C. J. (2000). Comparing stalking victimization from legal and victim perspectives. Violence and Victims, 15 (1): 7 - 22.