Bibliography

Evaluation of Tools, Methods, and Programs

Domestic Violence Publications

• Archer, C., DuPree, C., Miller, N. Spence, D., and Uekert, B. (2003). National evaluation of the grants to encourage arrest policies program. NCJ 199441. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Bennett, L. and Williams, O. (2001).  Controversies and recent studies of batterer intervention program effectiveness. National Electronic Network for Violence Against Women.



• *Berk, R. A., Smyth, G. A., and Sherman, L. W. (1988). When random assignment fails: Some lessons from the Minneapolis Spouse Abuse Experiment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4 (3), 209 - 223.



• Borjesson, W. I., Aarons, G. A., Dunn, M. E. (2003). Development and confirmatory factor analysis of the abuse within intimate relationships scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (3), 295 - 309.



• Brame, R. (2000). Investigating treatment effects in a domestic violence experiment with partially missing outcome data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16 (3), 283 - 314.



• Caliber Associates. (2004).  The Greenbook Demonstration Initiative: Process evaluation report: Phase I (January 2001 - June 2002). NCJ 204955. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Caliber Associates. (2005).  The Greenbook Demonstration Initiative, interim evaluation report. NCJ 209733. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Campbell, J. C., Kozial-McLain, J., Webster, D., Block, C. R., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., Gary, F., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., Sharps, P., Ulrich, Y., Wilt, S., and Manganello, J. (2004).  Research results from a national study of intimate partner homicide: The Danger Assessment Instrument. NCJ 199710. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Campbell, J., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C. R., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., Gary, F., McFarlane, J., Sachs, C., Sharps, P., Ulrich, Y., and Wilt, S. A. (2003). Assessing risk factors for intimate partner homicide. NIJ Journal, 250(9): 14-19. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Cavanaugh, M. M. and Gelles, R. J. (2005). The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: New directions for research, policy, and practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20 (2), 155 - 166.



• Cissner, A. B. (2009). Evaluating the Mentors in Violence Prevention Program: Preventing gender violence on a college campus. Center for Court Innovation.



• Dalton, B. (2007). What's going on out there? A survey of batterer intervention programs. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15 (1), 59 - 74.



• Davis, R. C, Taylor, B. G., and Maxwell, C. D. (2000).  Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. NCJ 180772. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Davis, R. C., Weisburd, D., and Hamilton, E. E. (2007).  Preventing repeat incidents of family violence: A randomized field test of a second responder program in Redlands, CA. NCJ 219840. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• DeKeseredy, W. S. and Schwartz, M. D. (1998).  Measuring the extent of woman abuse in intimate heterosexual relationships: A critique of the Conflict Tactics Scale. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Friday, P. C., Lord, V. B., Exum, M. L., and Hartman, J. L. (2006).  Evaluating the impact of a specialized domestic violence police unit. NCJ 215916. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Fugate, M., George, C., Haber, N., and Stawiski, S. (2006).  Providing a citywide system of single point access to domestic violence information, resources, and referrals to a diverse population: An evaluation of the city of Chicago Domestic Violence Help Line. NCJ 214650. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Garner, J. H., Fagan, J., and Maxwell, C. (1995). Published finding from the Spouse Assault Replication Program: A critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11 (1), 3 - 28.



• Gover, A. R., MacDonald, J. M., Alpert, G. P., and Geary, I. A. (2004).  Lexington County domestic violence court: A partnership and evaluation. NCJ 204023. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Haas, S., Bauer-Leffler, S., and Turley, E. (2001).Evaluation of cross-disciplinary training on the co-occurrence of domestic violence and child victimization: Overcoming barriers to collaboration. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 34(3).
• Hartley, C. C. and Frohmann, L. (2003).  Cook County Target Abuser Call (TAC): An evaluation of a specialized domestic violence court. NCJ 202944. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Heckert, D. A. and Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Battered women's perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (7), 778 - 800.



• Hendy, H. M., Weinter, K., Bakerofskie, J., Eggen, D., Gustituts, C., and McLeod, K. C. (2003). Comparison of six models for violent romantic relationships in college men and women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (6): 645 - 665.



• Hotaling, G. T. and Buzawa, E. S. (2003).  Victim satisfaction with criminal justice case processing in a model court setting. NCJ 195668. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Jones, A. S., D'Agostino, Jr., R. B., Gondolf, E. W., and Heckert, A. (2004). Assessing the effect of batterer program completion on reassault using propensity scores. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19 (9), 955 - 966.



• Institute for Law and Justice. (2005).  National evaluation of the Legal Assistance for Victims Program. NCJ 208612. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Klein, A. R., Wilson, D., Crowe, A. H., and DeMichele, M. (2008).  Evaluation of the Rhode Island Probation Specialized Domestic Violence Supervision Unit. NCJ 222912. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Lyon, E. (2005).  Impact evaluation of special session domestic violence: Enhanced advocacy and interventions. NCJ 210362. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., and Fagan, J. A. (2001).  The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. Research in Brief. NCJ 188199. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• McFarlane, J., Malecha, A., Gist, J., Watson, K., Batten, E., Hall, I., and Smith, S. (2002). Intimate partner violence against immigrant women: Measuring the effectiveness of protection orders. American Journal of Family Law, 16 244 - 252.



• Moracco, K. E., Clark, K. A., Espersen, C., and Bowling, J. M. (2006).  Preventing firearms volence among victims of intimate partner violence: An evaluation of a new North Carolina law. NCJ 215773. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Murphy, c. M., Morrel, T. M., Elliott, J. D., and Neavins, T. M. (2003). A prognostic indicator scale for the treatment of partner abuse perpetrators. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (9), 1087 - 1105.



• Piquero, A. R., Brame, R., Fagan, J., and Moffitt, T. E. (2005).  Assessing the offending activity of criminal domestic violence suspects: Offense specialization, escalation, and de-escalation evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. NCJ 212298. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Piquero, A. R., Brame, R., Fagan, J., and Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Assessing the offending activity of criminal domestic violence suspects: Offense specialization, escalation, and de-escalation evidence from the Spouse Assault Replication Program. Public Health Reports, 121, 409-418.



• Roehl, J., O'Sullivan, C., Webster, D., and Campbell, J. (2005).  Intimate partner violence risk assessment validation study. NCJ 209731. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Roehl, J., O'Sullivan, C., Webster, D., and Campbell, J. (2005).  Intimate partner violence risk assessment validation study: The RAVE study -- Practitioner summary and recommendations: Validation of tools for assessing risk from violent intimate partners. NCJ 209732. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Ryan, R. and Petrzelka, P. (2004).  Protective Order Enforcement Team (POET) evaluation. NCJ 203980. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Schlueter, M., Wicklund, P., Adler, R., Owen, J., and Halvorsen, T. (2011). Bennington County Integrated Domestic Violence Docket Project: Outcome evaluation. Vermont Center for Justice Research.
• Shepard, M. (1999).  Evaluating coordinated community responses to domestic violence. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Short, L. M. and Rodriguez, R. (2002). Testing an intimate partner violence assessment icon form with battered migrant and seasonal farmworker women. Women & Health, 35 (2/3), 71 - 81.



• *Smith, B. E., Davis, R. C., and Nickles, L. B. (2000).  Impact evaluation of victim services programs: STOP grants funded by the Violence Against Women Act. NCJ 183460. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Sullivan, C. (2001).  Evaluating the outcomes of domestic violence service programs: Some practical considerations and strategies. National Electronic Network on Violence Against Women.



• Texas Women's University. (2003).  Increasing victim safety and system accountability: Evaluating a collaborative intervention between health care and criminal justice. NCJ 201945. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B. K., Miller, N., DuPree, C., Spence, D., and Archer, C. (2001).  The evaluation of the STOP Violence Against Women Grant Program: Law enforcement and prosecution components. Institute for Law and Justice.



• Uekert, B., Sagatun-Edwards, I., Crowe, A., Peters, T., Cheesman, F., and Kameda, D. (2006).  Juvenile domestic and family violence: The effects of court-based intervention programs on recidivism. NCJ 216614. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.







Sexual Violence Publications

• Campbell, R., Patterson, D., Adams, A. E., Diegel, R., and Coats, S. (2008). Participatory evaluation project to measure SANE nursing practice and adult sexual assault patients' psychological well-being. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 4 (1): 19 - 28.



• Crandall, C. S. and Helitzer, D. (2003).  Impact evaluation of a sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program. NCJ 203276. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Friendship, Ca., Mann, R. E., and Beech, A. R. (2003). Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment program for sexual offenders in England and Wales. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (7): 744 - 759.



• Institute for Law and Justice. (2005).  National evaluation of the Legal Assistance for Victims Program. NCJ 208612. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Meyer, H. (2002).  College sexual assault programs that have been evaluated: A review.



• Morrison, S., Hardison, J., Mathew, A. and O'Neil, J. (2004).  Evidence-based review of sexual assault preventive intervention programs. NCJ 207262. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Nugent-Borakove, M. E., Fanflik, P., Troutman, D., Johnson, N., Burgess, A., O'Conner, A. L. (2006).  Testing the efficacy of SANE/SART programs: Do they make a difference in sexual assault arrest and prosecution outcomes? NCJ 214252. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• *Prentky, R., Knight, R. and Rosenberg, R. (1988). Validation analyses on the MTC taxonomy for rapists: Disconfirmation and reconceptualization. In Prentky's and Quinsey's (Eds) Human Sexual Aggression: Current Perspectives. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.



• *Rosenberg, R., Knight, R. A., Prentky, R., and Lee, A. (1988). Validating the components of a taxonomic system for rapists: A path analytic approach. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16: 169 - 185.



• Schweitzer, R. and Dwyer, J. (2003). Sex crime recidivism: Evaluation of a sexual offender treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18 (11): 1292 - 1310.



• Skinner, T. and Taylor, H. (2004).  Providing counseling, support and information to survivors of rape: An evaluation of the 'STAR' Young Persons' Project. NCJ 211339. Home Office.



• *Smith, B. E., Davis, R. C., and Nickles, L. B. (2000).  Impact evaluation of victim services programs: STOP grants funded by the Violence Against Women Act. NCJ 183460. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.



• Uekert, B. K., Miller, N., DuPree, C., Spence, D., and Archer, C. (2001).  The evaluation of the STOP Violence Against Women Grant Program: Law enforcement and prosecution components. Institute for Law and Justice.